Analyzing Asset Retirement Obligations

The accounting treatment of Asset Retirement Obligations (AROs) differs from that of other obligations, particularly financial obligations. However, the economic consequenses are similar. As a result, analysts often adjust a company’s financial statements to treat the AROs as financial obligations as follows:

  1. The ARO is reduced by the amount of any offsetting trust funds or escrow accounts.
  2. The ARO is reduced by the tax rate to account for the tax savings that will result when the obligation is met.
  3. The remaining value of the ARO is added to long-term debt.
  4. Accretion expense is reclassified from operating expenses to interest expense.

By increasing the amount of long-term debt and interest expense without affecting either sales or net income, this reclassification has the effect of increasing leverage ratios such as debt/equity and reducing solvency ratios such as interest coverage.

For more information, see all articles on: Accounting, Adjusting Reported Financial Statements, Financial Statement Analysis, Fundamental Analysis, Ratio Analysis

See also:
  • Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
  • Asset Retirement Obligations – US Cellular Case Study
  • Postretirement Obligations
  • Analyzing the Auditor’s Statement: Adverse Opinion
  • Pension Obligation Assumptions
  • Technical Analysis Explained : The Successful Investor's Guide to Spotting Investment Trends and Turning Points

    The Intelligent Investor: The Classic Text on Value Investing

    Financial Statement Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide, 3rd Edition

    Managing Investment Portfolios: A Dynamic Process (CFA Institute Investment Series)

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.