Not All Indexed Portfolios Are Equal

Elton, Gruber and Busse compared the returns and expenses of various portfolios indexed to the S&P 500. They found the difference between the best-performing and worst performing S&P 500 fund was 2.09% annually from 1996 through 2001. The differences in return were the result of both the fee structure and other factors such as securities lending practices.

This difference is important, as investors in an indexed portfolio expect to receive approximately the return on the index each year. To the extent that there are substantial variances among indexed portfolios the purported tracking risk reduction relative to actively managed portfolios is lost.

For more information, see all articles on: Asset Allocation, Investing in Stocks, Investment Returns, Portfolio Management, Security Selection

See also:
  • Alpha and Beta Separation
  • Passive Investment Vehicles
  • Core-Satellite Approach to Equity Manager Selection
  • Limitations of Economic Data
  • Presenting Composite Returns Under Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS)
  • Technical Analysis Explained : The Successful Investor's Guide to Spotting Investment Trends and Turning Points

    The Intelligent Investor: The Classic Text on Value Investing

    Financial Statement Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide, 3rd Edition

    Managing Investment Portfolios: A Dynamic Process (CFA Institute Investment Series)

    One Response to “Not All Indexed Portfolios Are Equal”

    1. TheFinancialWhiz.Com » Carnival of Investment Strategies - July 20, 2007 Says:

      [...] presents Not All Indexed Portfolios Are Equal posted at Financial [...]

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.