Persistent mispricings should attract profit-seeking investors to exploit them. This, in turn, should eventually cause the anomaly to disappear. There are several potential reasons for anomalies to persist.
Certain anomalies may not have a logical explanation, causing investors to be wary of trying to exploit them.
Particularly for less liquid securities, there may be significant costs involved in trading them. The higher the costs, the greater a mispricing must be in order for arbitrageurs to try to exploit it.
Large investors, in particular, may find that certain mispricings do not offer a significant return for the time involved in identifying and exploiting them.
Many investors have limits imposed on their activity, such as a prohibition on short selling. Such prohibitions can prevent investors from exploiting opportunities when identified.
Posted on 30th July 2008
Under: Active Management, Investing in Stocks, Investment Returns, Passive Management | No Comments »
Using the Monte Carlo method to estimate Value at Risk (VaR) produces a set of random outcomes reflecting the effects of particular sets of risks. Each set of outcomes is based on a probability distribution for each variable of interest. The distributions for each variable can be normal or non-normal.
Monte Carlo simulations are frequently the only method that provides a practical means to generate necessary risk management information. However, it can become quite a hog of computer resources for large portfolios.
Posted on 29th July 2008
Under: Governance, Portfolio Management, Risk Management | No Comments »
In behavioral finance, escalation bias causes investors to invest more in money-losing investments for which they feel responsible than they invest in an ongoing successful investment. The popular concept of “averaging down” to reduce the average price paid for the investment may be representative of this bias.
The rational, traditional finance model would expect investors to re-evaluate holdings for potential bad news that they had failed to incorporate into their initial valuation. If the re-evaluation supports the investment, then more could be added. Otherwise, it would be wiser to exit the position and take the loss.
Posted on 29th July 2008
Under: Behavioral Finance | No Comments »
A number of factors affect performance evaluation for hedge funds, particularly with respect to using the Sharpe ratio to measure risk-adjusted return.
Starting with return, typically monthly returns are compounded to an annualized rate of return. However, entry and exit opportunities may be permitted only quarterly or even less frequently. In addition, some measures of downside risk such as the maximum drawdown are not compounded. Measures comparing return (compounded) and drawdown (not compounded) may not fully reflect the risk/return profile.
The Sharpe ratio is defined as:
- Numerator is the difference between annualized return and the annualized risk-free rate
- Denominator is the annualized standard deviation of returns
The Sharpe ratio increases proportionately with the square root of time, and is not appropriate when returns are asymmetrical. In particular, the Sharpe ratio tends to be overestimated when returns are serially correlated or assets are illiquid. Furthermore, the correlations between the fund and an investor’s other portfolio assets are not considered.
There are a number of ways managers can “game” the Sharpe ratio, including:
- Lengthening the measurement interval
- Compounding monthly returns but calculating standard deviations without compounding
- Writing out of money put or call options to produce asymmetric returns
- Smoothing returns
- Using swaps to eliminate extreme outlying returns
In part because of these deficiencies, the Sharpe ratio has not been found to be a good predictor of hedge fund returns.
Posted on 28th July 2008
Under: Active Management, Alternative Assets, Asset Allocation, Hedge Funds, Investment Returns, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
Venture capital investors typically receive convertible preferred stock when funding companies. If the company is forced to liquidate, the preferred shares will have precedence in receiving funds. The company founders will hold a residual stake of common shares. If subsequent funding rounds are provided, each round is typically senior to the previous.
Typically the preferred investors must see a return of capital and also some investment return (often a total of 2x the capital contributed) before any cash can be returned to common shareholders. This provides the founders with an incentive to earn the return required by their investors so they can reap their own rewards.
The preferred shares are also convertible to common shares, which is typically done when a corporate action (merger or IPO) creates liquidity for the common shares and an opportunity to cash out.
Posted on 27th July 2008
Under: Active Management, Alternative Assets, Institutional Investing, Investing in Private Equity, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
In Technical Analysis Explained, Martin Pring notes that since there are three major financial markets (stocks, bonds and commodities) and each has two turning points in a given cycle, there are six turning points in each cycle. He calls these turning points the six stages and uses them as a reference point for identifying the current phase of the business cycle and by extension the next likely turning point.
Stage 1: Slowing growth rates or early recession. Interest rates start to fall and bonds rally.
Stage 2: Business cycle trough. Stocks begin to rally.
Stage 3: Late recession and early recovery. Commodities begin to rally.
Stage 4: Early recovery. Interest rates trough and bonds peak.
Stage 5: Cycle peak. Stocks peak.
Stage 6: Slowing growth, commodities peak.
Posted on 25th July 2008
Under: Economic Analysis, Investing in Commodities, Investing in Stocks, Investing in bonds, Technical Analysis | No Comments »
International bond managers can seek excess return from a variety of sources:
- Bond market selection – choosing the best country in which to invest
- Currency selection – deciding whether to hedge or retain currency risk
- Duration/yield curve management – getting the most favorable returns within the selected market
- Sector selection – choosing among government, corporate, local currency or dollar-denominated bonds
- Issuer credit analysis – being able to identify improvement or deterioration in advance of changes in rating
- Benchmark mismatches – investing in markets that are not included in the benchmark index
Posted on 24th July 2008
Under: Active Management, Asset Allocation, FInancial Planning, Fixed income investments, Investing in bonds, Investment Returns, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
Changes in interest rates affect both the reinvestment rate earned on portfolio income (directly) and the value of the portfolio (inversely.) An immunization strategy is designed to lock in total return over a specified time horizon by creating a portfolio in which the two total return factors exactly offset each other.
To immunize a portfolio over a single period, the portfolio must have duration equal to the investment horizon and an initial present value of cash flows equal to the present value of the future liability.
Since yield changes over time will result in duration changes other than those caused solely by the passage of time, it is necessary to periodically rebalance an immunized portfolio. This must be done only if the benefits outweigh the costs. Some transaction costs must be borne in order to avoid duration mismatch, but some duration mismatch is needed to avoid transaction costs.
Typically the rebalancing will restore the dollar duration equivalency to the time horizon. Dollar duration is the product of Duration X Portfolio Value X 0.01.
To rebalance the dollar duration requires three steps:
- Calculate present dollar duration based on the prevailing yield curve and time to maturity
- Calculate the rebalancing ratio by dividing the original dollar duration by the new dollar duration. This can be expressed as the percentage change for each position by subtracting one and converting the result into percentage terms.
- The new market value of the portfolio multiplied by the percentage change is the amount of cash that will be needed for rebalancing.
Posted on 23rd July 2008
Under: Active Management, Fixed income investments, Investing in bonds, Investment Returns, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
Investor Specific Concerns
Strategic asset allocation starts with the investor’s objectives, constraints, net worth and attitudes toward risk. A risk tolerance function can be applied to determine the investor’s specific risk tolerance.
Capital Market Situation
The current state of the market must be identified, and some procedure used to generate a set of expected returns, risks and correlations between asset classes.
Joint Investor-Market Relationship
Given the investor’s situation and the capital market outlook, an optimizer can be used to determine an allocation suited to the investor’s risk tolerance. The asset mix can be selected, and actual returns fed back into the process as feedback.
Posted on 20th July 2008
Under: Asset Allocation, FInancial Planning, Investment Returns, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
Purchasing Power Parity
Purchasing power parity (PPP) is based on the belief that movements in exchange rates should offset any difference in inflation between two economies. Over longer time horizons, purchasing power parity does tend to hold, in part because governments take the concept seriously and act to control relative inflation rates. In the short term, however, other factors such as capital flows can overwhelm the impact of PPP.
Relative Economic Strength
This concept focuses on investment flows rather than trade flows. It suggests that strong economies attract capital, which causes the currency to appreciate. Foreign investors must always weigh whether the higher yield offsets the risk of inflated currency values. Relative Economic Strength indicates how currencies should respond to economic news, but does not imply a “true” currency value. Because of this, many investors use it in conjunction with PPP to form a complete theory of interest rate movements.
Focuses on expected capital flows, particularly with respect to long-term capital investments. Capital flows can reverse the normal relationship between currencies and short-term interest rates, as the stimulative effect of a lower interest rate may outweigh the lower yield.
This theory explains currency movements in terms of savings relative to capital investment. If domestic savings are insufficient to cover capital investments, the remainder must come from foreign sources. To the extent that foreign investment is not offset by a trade imbalance, the currency must rise.
Posted on 19th July 2008
Under: Asset Allocation, Economic Analysis, FInancial Planning, Investment Returns, Portfolio Management | No Comments »