The concept of Value at Risk (VaR) has a number of practical advantages and disadvantages.
Advantages are that it:
- quantifies potential losses in simple terms (a 5% chance of a loss exceeding $1 million)
- has met with approval from various regulatory bodies concerned with the risks faced by financial institutions
- is versatile
- estimation difficulties, and sensitivity to estimation methods used
- potential to create a false sense of security
- tends to underestimate worst-case outcomes
- the VaR of a specific position doesn’t always translate well into the VaR of the overall portfolio
- it fails to incorporate positive outcomes, thus painting an incomplete picture
Posted on 29th August 2008
Under: Uncategorized | No Comments »
Managed futures investments are investments in commodities by professional managers using skill-based strategies. The strategies employed may be either systematic trading methods which usually are trend-following or discretionary strategies based on analysis and judgment of the manager.
Managed futures accounts are often classified according to market focus as either:
- Financial – investing in financial and currency futures and options
- Diversified – financial and physical commodities
Typically, managers are benchmarked to a group of managers employing a similar style. Investable benchmarks have also been established that rely on mechanical trend-following strategies. When comparing returns, it is important to understand that historical data is affected by survivorship bias.
Posted on 28th August 2008
Under: Active Management, Alternative Assets, Asset Allocation, Futures, Investing in Commodities, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
Private equity funds are typically structured as limited partnerships or limited liability corporations (LLCs). There are a number of reasons for this preference.
- No double taxation (profits taxed at limited partner or shareholder level)
- No liability beyond the initial investment
Typically private equity funds will be structured to have a 7-10 year life, with options to extend this for an additional 1-5 years. The objective is to realize the full value of investments by the liquidation date. Rather than manage pools of uninvested capital, private equity managers typically require commitments that are drawn down as the funds are needed to make investments or cover expenses.
Fees for private equity managers typically include a management fee of 1.5% – 2.0% of assets under management, plus an incentive fee of 15%-20% of the profits retained after capital is returned to the limited partners. The incentive fee may include a hurdle rate of return that must be met before the fee is earned, and also may include a claw-back provision in case later investments do poorly.
Posted on 27th August 2008
Under: Active Management, Alternative Assets, Institutional Investing, Investing in Private Equity, Portfolio Management, Securities Regulation | No Comments »
Companies that operate in global industries are subject to influences from both their country of domicile and their industry. As a result, both country analysis and global industry analysis are typically needed.
Country analysis can include not just the country of domicile, but also the major end markets in which a company operates. In each significant country market, analysts and economists typically monitor a wide range of economic, social and political variables. These can include:
- Expected real and nominal growth
- Monetary and fiscal policy
- Investment climate
- Business cycle stage
- Long-term sustainable growth
- Factors affecting employment and wages
- Social and political environment
Business cycles across countries are not fully synchronized, so some countries may recover or enter recession sooner than others. However, as markets become more globally integrated international business cycles tend to converge.
To estimate long-term sustainable growth, there are two primary competing theories.
- Neoclassical growth theory assumes that the marginal productivity of capital declines as more capital is added.
- Endogenous growth theory assumes that technological advances and improved labor force education can result in efficiency gains. These can prevent the decline in marginal productivity of capital.
As industries become more global, the country factors are also becoming less significant. Industry factors to consider include:
- Demand analysis – how is the global market for the company’s products and services growing?
- Value creation – Where on the supply chain is value created? Are there advantages to size, scale or scope? Is there a productivity learning curve in the industry?
- Industry life cycle – is the industry a pioneer, accelerating growth, mature, stable or decelerating industry?
- What is the industry’s competitive structure?
- What is the competitive advantage pursued by each industry participant?
Posted on 25th August 2008
Under: Economic Analysis, Fundamental Analysis, Industry Analysis | No Comments »
Duration measures the change in value for a bond given a 100 basis point change in interest rates. However, since international rates are not perfecltly correlated with domestic rates, the duration of a foreign bond does not have the same impact on value and portfolio duration for a change in domestic interest rates.
Instead, the relationship between domestic and foreign rates can be estimated empirically to determine a country beta.
The percentage change in a foreign bond due to a change in domestic interest rates would be estimated as the product of country beta and duration. The portfolio’s weighted average duration would also be affected by the weight of the foreign bond multiplied by the product of country beta and duration.
Posted on 24th August 2008
Under: Fixed income investments, Investing in bonds, Investment Returns, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
Investment analysts can fall into several psychological traps (and should strive to avoid doing so.)
Anchoring refers to giving disproportionate weight to the first information received about a topic.
Status quo bias is the tendency to perpetuate recent observations in forecasts.
Confirming evidence is the tendency to give more weight to information that supports existing or preferred points of view than to information that contradicts the preferred view.
Overconfidence is having too much faith in the accuracy of one’s forecasts.
Recallability is when forecasts are overly influenced by events that left a strong impression on the forecaster’s memory.
Posted on 18th August 2008
Under: Asset Allocation, Behavioral Finance, FInancial Planning, Institutional Investing, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
Continuous markets are those in which trades can occur at any time that the market is open. This can happen in one of three ways:
- An auction market, in which the trades are placed between investors without intermediaries. A trade occurs whenever the highest bid price and the lowest ask price match.
- A dealer market, in which intermediaries provide liquidity by setting minimum bid and maximum ask prices. In a dealer market, a dealer takes one side of each trade, and an investor takes the other.
- A hybrid market, in which dealers step in whenever the auction market is not sufficiently liquid.
Posted on 17th August 2008
Under: Investing in Stocks, Investing in bonds, Portfolio Management, Trading Execution | No Comments »
Sentiment indicators monitor the activity of market participants such as floor traders, insiders, mutual fund managers, etc. The premise behind such indicators is that certain types of investors will have similar reactions to future market events as they have had to past events. These reactions may prove useful for identifying market turning points.
Insiders and New York Stock Exchange members have historically been “right.” They tend to be net buyers at market tops and net sellers at market bottoms.
Advisory services, on the other hand, tend to buy at the top and sell at the bottom. Tracking the sentiment of newsletter writers, for example, may prove to be a useful contrary indicator.
Posted on 10th August 2008
Under: Behavioral Finance, Technical Analysis | No Comments »
The level of the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX) has been shown to predict returns on equity indexes, implying either that VIX variables are priced risk factors or that markets are inefficient. In the October 2007 Journal of Banking and Finance, Banerjee, Doran and Peterson show that this relationship is strongest for high-beta portfolios.
Studies have shown that high volatility index scores are positively related to future stock market returns. In an efficient market, an observable variable such as the VIX should not have predictive power. The authors confirm that the predictive power exists, and offer support for both the market inefficiency and the priced risk arguments.
Posted on 9th August 2008
Under: Active Management, Institutional Investing, Investing in Stocks, Investment Returns, Options, Portfolio Management | No Comments »
It is generally accepted that more accurate earnings forecasts by analysts should result in superior investment performance. In the Winter 2007 Journal of Investing Fortin, Gilkeson and Michelson examine three hypotheses to determine what factors may be advance indicators of superior forecast accuracy.
Hypothesis 1 is that more frequent forecast updates represent greater analyst effort and indicate greater accuracy. No support is found for this hypothesis.
Hypothesis 2 is that (a) greater changes in successive estimates result in more accurate forecasts and (b) given a tendency toward optimism, a decrease in estimates is a stronger indicator than a similar-size increase. Tests of this hypothesis find no support and even that larger changes suggest greater error and may be a signal of higher uncertainty, regardless of direction.
Hypothesis 3 is that (a) the magnitude of the change in earnings relative to last year’s earnings indicates greater accuracy and (b) a decrease is a stronger indicator than a similar magnitude increase. They find that larger changes lead to less accuracy, but that forecast declines lead to greater accuracy.
The authors conclude that investors should avoid following recommendations of analysts who frequently revise estimates and who change forecasts by significant amounts. However, they suggest that analysts forecasting earnings declines are worth noting.
Posted on 8th August 2008
Under: Fundamental Analysis, Investing in Stocks, Research | No Comments »